Pages

▼

Friday, August 14, 2026

MLB Ejection 093 - Vic Carapazza (2; Aaron Boone)

HP Umpire Vic Carapazza ejected Yankees manager Aaron Boone (strike one call to Luis García; QOCY) in the top of the 6th inning of the #Yankees-#BlueJays game. With two out and none on, Yankees batter García took a 0-0 knuckle curve from Blue Jays pitcher Shane Bieber for a called first strike. Replays indicate the pitch was located over the inner half of home plate and below the hollow beneath the knee (px 0.42, pz 1.53 [sz_bot 1.64 / RAD 1.52]) and that the Yankees had ABS challenges remaining but opted not to use any, the call was correct. At the time of the ejection, the Yankees were leading, 1-0. the Blue Jays ultimately won the contest, 3-1.

This is Vic Carapazza (19)'s 8th ejection of 2026.

This is the 93rd ejection report of the 2026 MLB regular season.
This is the 51st manager ejection of 2026. Ejection Tally: 51 Managers, 19 Coaches, 23 Players.
This is New York's 8th ejection of 2026, 3rd in the AL East (NYY 8; BOS 6; TOR 4; TB 3; BAL 2).
This is Aaron Boone's 4th ejection of 2026, 1st since July 8 (Doug Eddings; QOC = Y [Replay Review]).
This is Vic Carapazza's 8th ejection of 2026, 1st since June 30 (Miles Mikolas; QOC = U [Fighting]).

Thursday, August 13, 2026

MLB Ejection 092 - Alan Porter (5; Davis Martin)

HP Umpire Alan Porter ejected White Sox pitcher Davis Martin (throwing at Sal Stewart) in the top of the 3rd inning of the #Reds-#WhiteSox game. With none out and none on, Reds batter Stewart took a 0-1 fastball for a ball and 1-1 fastball for a hit-by-pitch. Replays indicate the 0-1 pitch was located inside and above Stewart's head while the 1-1 HBP struck Stewart in the head, the call was irrecusable.* At the time of the ejection, the White Sox were leading, 4-3. The Reds ultimately won the contest, 9-8.

This is Alan Porter (64)'s 5th ejection of 2026.
*Official Baseball Rule 6.02(c)(9) Comment: "Intentionally Pitch at the Batter...To pitch at a batter’s head is unsportsmanlike and highly dangerous. It should be—and is—condemned by everybody. Umpires should act without hesitation in enforcement of this rule."

This is the 92nd ejection report of the 2026 MLB regular season.
This is the 23rd player ejection of 2026. Ejection Tally: 50 Managers, 19 Coaches, 23 Players.
This is Chicago's 2nd ejection of 2026, 3rd in the AL Central (MIN 4; CWS, DET 2; CLE, KC 1).
This is David Martin's first career MLB ejection.
This is Alan Porter's 5th ejection of 2026, 1st since July 6 (Kyle Schwarber; QOC = U-c [Check Swing]).

Wednesday, August 12, 2026

MLB Ejections 090-1 - Dan Merzel (x2; Weiss & Chris Sale)

Umpire Dan Merzel ejected Braves manager Walt Weiss and pitcher Chris Sale (balk call; QOCY) in the bottom of the 5th inning of the #Braves-#Yankees game. With one out and one on, and Austin Wells at bat, HP Umpire Merzel called Sale for a balk for stepping, as in Windup Position, while standing in Set Position, without notifying the umpire his intent to pitch from the Windup Position while in Hybrid stance.* Replays indicate Sale lifted his free foot and returned it to the ground, which, with runner(s), is a start-stop balk, the call was correct. At the time of the ejection, the Yankees were leading, 3-2. The Yankees ultimately won the contest, 5-4.

The next day, 3B Umpire Merzel ejected Sale prior to the plate meeting as the umpires entered the playing field for continuing to argue the balk from the night before. The call is similarly correct. At the time of the ejection, the game had not started yet.

These are Dan Merzel (3)'s 4th and 5th ejections of 2026.
*Official Baseball Rule 5.07(a)(2) Comment: "With a runner or runners on base, a pitcher will be presumed to be pitching from the Set Position if they stand with their pivot foot in contact with and parallel to the pitcher’s plate, and their other foot in front of the pitcher’s plate, unless they notify the umpire that they will be pitching from the Windup Position under such circumstances prior to the beginning of an at-bat."

These are the 90th and 91st ejection reports of the 2026 MLB regular season.
This is the 50th manager ejection of 2026.
This is the 22nd player ejection of 2026. Ejection Tally: 50 Managers, 19 Coaches, 22 Players.
This is Atlanta's 2/3rd ejection of 2026, 2nd in the NL East (PHI 4; ATL, MIA 3; NYM, WAS 2).
This is Walt Weiss' 1st ejection since Sept 22, 2016 (Alfonso Marquez; QOC = N [Balls/Strikes]).
This is Chris Sale's 1st ejection since August 3, 2019 (Mike Estabrook; QOC = N [Balls/Strikes]).
This is Dan Merzel's 4/5th ejection of 2026, 1st since June 19 (Mark Kotsay; QOC = Y [Balls/Strikes]).

Wrap: Atlanta Braves vs New York Yankees, 8/8/26

Tuesday, August 11, 2026

Failed Fourth Out Time Play in Toronto vs Boston

Boston scored a run during Ceddanne Rafaela's sacrifice fly despite Red Sox runner R3 Anthony Seigler failing to tag up, bringing Blue Jays manager John Schneider out of Toronto's dugout as Umpire Crew Chief Chris Guccione explained a cavalcade of rules from time play to fourth out, appeal, and retouch. BOSS Operator & scoreboard factors played a key role in the confusion and we review it all here.

The play: With runners on first and third and one out, Red Sox batter Rafaela hit a fly ball to Blue Jays CF Brett Bateman as baserunners and R1 Nick Sogard and R3 Anthony Seigler ran the bases as if there were two outs, failing to tag up. Toronto appealed R1 Sogard's failure to tag up at first base and ran off the field as the inning ended on the fly out-appeal out double play.

The controversy: Umpires ruled that R3 Seigler's run counted, despite Seigler failing to tag or retouch third base, as required by rule on a caught fly ball.

The confusion: Toronto's Ball-Out-Strike System (BOSS) operator mistakenly keyed two outs on the scoreboard, instead of one, erroneously attributing a second out to the prior play which featured a close catch/no catch call with Blue Jays 1B Vladimir Guerrero Jr. short-hopping Sogard's sharp line drive, ruled no catch (safe) by 1B Umpire Nestor Ceja. The BOSS operator then changed the scoreboard's displayed "2" outs during Rafaela's fly ball, which occurred on the first pitch of the at-bat. The Red Sox baserunners may have falsely relied on the scoreboard's erroneous "2" out display and ran the bases as if there had been two outs.

The rules review: First and foremost, we visit Official Baseball Rule 5.08(a) regarding how a team scores: "One run shall be scored each time a runner legally advances to and touches first, second, third and home base before three players are put out to end the inning." When a play occurs during which a runner may or may not have touched home plate prior to the third out occurring at another base on another runner, a time play occurs in which the plate umpire must determine if the touch of home plate occurred prior to the third out or not.

There is an exception to time plays in OBR 5.08(a): "EXCEPTION:  A run is not scored if the runner advances to home base during a play in which the third out is made (1) by the batter-runner before they touch first base; (2) by any runner being forced out; or (3) by a preceding runner who is declared out because they failed to touch one of the bases."

Toronto may have argued that exception (2) regarding force plays applied, but this is incorrect: "A FORCE PLAY is a play in which a runner legally loses their right to occupy a base by reason of the batter becoming a runner. (Force Play) Comment: Confusion regarding this play is removed by remembering that frequently the “force” situation is removed during the play."

Accordingly, R1 Sogard may have been forced to advance at the beginning of the play, but the force situation was removed when the batter was retired on the fly out to CF. An approved ruling in OBR 5.08 further reinforces that failing to retouch a base is not a force play.

The definition of appeal play thus becomes a factor: "Any runner shall be called out, on appeal, when: (1) After a fly ball is caught, they fail to retouch their original base before they are or their original base is tagged."

Because R3 Seigler touched home plate prior to the appeal play third out on R1 Sogard at first place, R3 Seigler's run counts due to the time play. In order for R3 Seigler's run not to count, the Blue Jays would have to appeal that R3 failed to retouch third base after the caught fly ball. Toronto did not.

Although the third out was the appeal on R1 at first base, R3 could still be appealed under OBR 5.09(c)'s fourth out rule: "If the third out is made during a play in which an appeal play is sustained on another runner, the appeal play decision takes precedence in determining the out. If there is more than one appeal during a play that ends a half-inning, the defense may elect to take the out that gives it the advantage."

Appeals must be made before the next pitch, play, or attempted play, but because the appeal on R1 ended the inning, a fourth out appeal on R3 would have to occur before the defensive team leaves the field, defined as the pitcher and all infielders crossing the foul line/leaving fair territory on the way to the bench.

With no appeal, we revert to a time play, meaning that R3's run counts and the inning is over.

Video as follows: