Deceptive Angle - Woodring's Parallax Check Swing

When umpire Tom Woodring's check swing call angered Rays batter Mallex Smith on Tuesday, Tampa Bay's broadcast utilized a camera angle to suggest Smith didn't go, while Washington's replay suggested a strike. Why the discrepancy? Answer: Parallax, an effect known to hockey fans for quite some time that applies to any sport with variable camera angles.

The origins of parallax go back to Ancient Greek (parallaxis), but the theory behind this visual oddity is rather simple. When a viewer looks at a distant object in front of a background which itself is at any amount of distance (even just inches) from the object (here, we're looking at a bat on the background of either home plate or Smith's own body), the angle with which the viewer sees the object from will dictate how this object appears in front of the distant background.

Parallax effect in hockey: Same timecodes.

Hockey: Parallax plays a huge role in hockey's use of limited replay—namely when reviewing whether a puck has entirely crossed the red goal line. Because the red line itself is painted about an inch below the ice surface, even a puck that lies flat on the ice is subject to the parallax effect, as demonstrated by the accompanying image. For accuracy's sake, a top-down view is required to conclusively adjudicate most goal line plays.

Baseball (Woodring/Smith Check Swing): Accordingly, Washington's replay angle from the camera well located closest to the first base line extended provides us with a view that is more suggestive of a "swing" than Tampa Bay's angle, which is located farther along foul territory on the third base side of the field.

This explains why two different angles might have made Smith's check swing look like two different events.
Related Post: MLB Ejection 052 - Tom Woodring (1; Mallex Smith)

What big league baseball does right in regard to check swings is consistently have the home plate umpire call the initial pitch, and, if necessary, refer to the first or third base umpire on appeal. This provides a consistent angle up the respective foul lines for the field umpires, who, due to parallax, are more apt not to rule a swing than the plate umpire.

What this means is that if a base umpire rules "swing" so as to affirm the appeal, that base umpire will have adjudged the swing from an angle less suggestive than the plate umpire's angle of a swing. This ensures the base umpire's election to overturn the "no swing" call at home plate is based on a higher threshold of evidence to suggest that the batter did, in fact, swing.

In other words, all else equal, given the differing angles (and assuming that pitch location is so far in the dirt so as not to be a distraction for the plate umpire), a plate umpire is more apt to rule a swing on a 50-50 play than a base umpire is for that same exact check swing, due solely to the parallax angles.

Image of red line for parallax coin experiment.

A simple experiment you can conduct at home to illustrate the parallax effect requires just your smart phone and a small coin.

In order for the demonstration to work, your phone will need to have a screen that is underneath the glass. Generally speaking, the distance between the LCD, digitizer, and front glass lens is nary a millimeter, but even this is enough to demonstrate the parallax effect.

Parallex Effect Demonstration: Smart Phone and Coin
Step 1) On your smart phone, open an image of a red line (such as the one attached to this article).
Step 2) While looking directly overhead ("straight down") the phone, place the coin flat on the phone's screen so only a tiny portion of its edge is over the red line.
Step 3) Keeping the phone and coin stationary, adjust your head height and overall depth, as if simulating a camera in motion. Notice how from certain angles ("in front"), the coin appears entirely not in contact with the red line while from other angles ("behind"), the coin appears greatly in contact with the line.

Video as follows:

MLB Ejection 052 - Tom Woodring (1; Mallex Smith)

3B Umpire Tom Woodring ejected Rays CF Mallex Smith (check swing strike three call) in the top of the 8th inning of the Rays-Nationals game. With none out and two on (R1, R2), Smith attempted to check his swing on a 0-2 changeup from Nationals pitcher Max Scherzer ruled a ball and adjudicated as a swinging strike on appeal by 3B Umpire Woodring. Play was reviewed and adjudicated by the UEFL Appeals Board (9-0-0), the call was correct. At the time of the ejection, the Nationals were leading, 4-2. The Nationals ultimately won the contest, 4-2.

This is Tom Woodring (75)'s first ejection of 2018.
Tom Woodring now has 6 points in the UEFL Standings (2 Prev + 2 AAA + 2 Correct Call = 6).
Crew Chief Ted Barrett now has 11 points in Crew Division (10 Previous + 1 Correct Call = 1).
*This is the first ejection since May 28: E-051 - Mark Carlson (1; Clint Hurdle).

This is the 52nd ejection report of the 2018 MLB regular season.
This is the 25th player ejection of 2018. Prior to ejection, Smith was 0-3 (2 SO) in the contest.
This is Tampa Bay's 1st ejection of 2018, T-3rd in the AL East (NYY 5; TOR 3; BAL, BOS, TB 1).
This is Mallex Smith's first career MLB ejection.
This is Tom Woodring's first ejection since March 16, 2017 (Yasiel Puig; QOC = U [Balls/Strikes]).

Wrap: Tampa Bay Rays vs. Washington Nationals, 6/5/18 | Video as follows:

Replay Review, Ground Rules, and Levi's Landing

A batted ball poised to land atop the green metal roof on AT&T Park's right field wall went to Replay Review a home run and came out the other end a fan interference-aided double.

Replay Review spent 5 minutes on this play.

*UPDATE*: MLB Admits HR Replay Error in Giants Game (9/1/17).

This play is an exercise in ground rule particulars for AT&T Park, a quick revisit to baseball's fan interference rules, and a discussion of the definition of a rather common dictionary term. It's also a rudimentary review of sound structural engineering in the earthquake country known as California, and how a simple case of construction best practices led to a confusing situation.

The Play: With none out and one on (R2) in the bottom of the 9th inning of a 5-1 Cardinals-Giants game, Giants batter Brandon Crawford hit a 2-2 pitch from Cardinals reliever John Brebbia to deep right field near the foul pole. As the ball descended toward the wall, a fan reached across and in front of the foul pole to catch the live ball before it struck the outfield wall, roof, or pole.

The Call: 1B Umpire Tom Woodring signaled "home run," a call that contained several significant elements. First, Woodring ruled the ball fair. Second, Woodring ruled the ball left the playing field in flight. Third, Woodring ruled the ball had not been subject to spectator interference before leaving the playing field (or if it had, that the ball would have been a home run regardless of the fan's actions).

Conflict: Local Ground Rules vs Universal Ground Rules - Which Rule Supersedes the Other?

A fan reaches to grab a batted ball in flight.

Unfortunately, local ground rules in San Francisco appear somewhat in conflict with the Universal Ground Rules issued by the Office of the Commissioner. According to the AT&T Park Ground Rule Particulars, "batted ball landing on green metal on top of right field wall: Home Run." By contrast, the Commissioner's Universal Ground Rules issued for use at all MLB stadiums state, "all yellow lines are in play." As evidenced by the attached photograph, there is a yellow line painted onto the green metal on top of the right field wall at AT&T Park: the foul pole is clearly recessed and does not begin at the front edge of the green metal, yet no rule specifically states that a foul pole must be positioned at the front edge of dead ball territory (and, for structural engineering reasons we'll discuss later, it would be irresponsible to place the foul pole here). Again, however, a Universal Ground Rule does say that "all yellow lines" are in play.

Meanwhile, Official Baseball Rule 4.05, entitled "Special Ground Rules," states:

The manager of the home team shall present to the umpire-in-chief and the opposing manager any ground rules he thinks necessary covering the overflow of spectators upon the playing field, batted or thrown balls into such overflow, or any other contingencies. If these rules are acceptable to the opposing manager they shall be legal. If these rules are unacceptable to the opposing manager, the umpire-in-chief shall make and enforce any special ground rules he thinks are made necessary by ground conditions, which shall not conflict with the official playing rules.

The MLB Umpire Manual, regarding a fly ball striking the top of a wall, posits several contingencies:
A) "Unless provided otherwise by local ground rule, a fair fly ball striking the top of the outfield wall and bounding back onto the playing field shall be treated the same as a fair fly ball that strikes the outfield wall and rebounds back onto the playing field";
B) "Unless provided otherwise by local ground rule, a fair fly ball striking the top of the outfield wall and bounding over the wall shall be ruled a home run";
C) "Unless provided otherwise by a local ground rule, a fair fly ball striking the top of the outfield wall and remaining on the op of the wall shall be deemed a ground-rule double";
D) "Unless provided otherwise by local ground rule, a fair fly ball striking the top of the outfield wall that in the umpire's judgment would have bounded over the wall if not for the permissible action of a spectator shall be ruled a home run. A fair fly ball that strikes the top of the outfield wall and is picked up by a spectator while still in motion shall also be ruled a home run. A fair fly ball that lands on top of the outfield wall and is picked up by a spectator after coming to a stop shall be deemed a ground-rule double."

Thus, in conclusion, based on the MLB Umpire Manual's verbiage, the local ground rule supersedes the Universal Ground Rules insofar as a fair fly ball at the outfield wall is concerned. Thus, we're back to the AT&T Park ground rule about a batted ball "landing" on the green metal. Conflict solved.

Dictionary Definition, Landing: "an act of returning to the ground or another surface after a flight." As any pilot or aviation enthusiast will surely tell you, a full-stop "landing" encompasses everything from descending through the air until the airplane finally comes to rest.

Two types of outfield wall at AT&T Park.
Here's an ejection over an argument about
the concrete slant portion of the wall.

So can the ball still be moving/is the initial "strike" on the metal enough for a "landing"?
Back to the airplane example, I'm sure most of us have been on flights with a "bounce" landing: the plan bounces on the runway before finally completing its touchdown. Would you consider the first "bounce" part of the overarching "landing"? A glimpse at the MLBUM's "D)" provision might be a clue: if a spectator picks up a ball while it is still in motion, it is a home run. If a spectator picks it up after coming to rest, it is a ground rule double.

Wait, a spectator can cause a fair batted ball hit on top of a wall to be a home run or a ground rule double based on when (s)he touches it? Yes, per the MLBUM, it's a HR if touched while the ball is on top of the wall and still in motion, and a ground-rule double if touched while on top of the wall after the ball has come to rest, unless provided otherwise by a local ground rule. Still, a nice little loophole to consider if you're a fan of the home team.

In this case, AT&T Park's ground rule states a batted ball landing on the green metal is a home run.

Fieldin Culbreth displays a fan INT signal.

Spectator Interference Rule: Fan interference occurs when "a spectator reaches out of the stands, or goes on the playing field, and (1) touches a live ball or (2) touches a player and hinders and attempt to make a play on a live ball." Meanwhile, the ball becomes dead when it leaves the playing field or is touched by a fan. If the fan in San Francisco never reached out beyond the green metal roof atop the wall, then he never satisfied the "reaches out of the stands" provision of the spectator interference rule; thus, this play is not subject to a call of fan interference.

Let's see what the final call ended up being.

Woodring (L) and Everitt await NY's ruling.

The Review and Call: Upon Crew Chief Review initiated by 3B Umpire Mike Everitt (having just returned from Tuesday's injury in Colorado), the Replay Official in New York elected to overturn 1B Umpire Woodring's call and ruled the play a double, concluding that the fan had reached out of the stands and touched a live ball, and that, absent the fan's actions, the ball would not have landed on the green metal atop the right field wall.

As a result, the baserunner was awarded two bases (2B => HP) and the batter was similarly awarded two bases, for a double.

Actual location vs spot required for fan INT.

Conclusion: Based on the aforementioned discussion, side angle replays, and AT&T Park Ground Rule Particulars, there should have only been two potential outcomes for this play:
1) Woodring's HR call stands as called, or;
2) Woodring's HR call is overturned to that of foul ball.

The attached image demonstrates the fan's proximity toward the playing-edge of the right field wall, which would have been a necessary achievement in order to draw a call of spectator interference.

Thus, the Replay Official either employed particularly unique judgment in approximating the fan's reach past the leading edge of the green metal roof or failed to properly apply the local ground rule for AT&T Park's green metal-capped wall in right field.

Could the Giants Protest? Assume the ground rule was wholly misapplied. Replay Review Regulation II.L.4 dictates what happens when a team protests a Replay Review decision: "Official Baseball Rule 7.04 (formerly Rule 4.19 [concerning protests]) shall have no applicability to these Replay Regulations. No protest shall ever be permitted on judgment decisions by the Replay Official. Moreover, a violation of any rule or procedure set forth herein shall not constitute a basis for protesting a game."

Logically, this would be a HR without the fan.

History of the Right Field Wall at San Francisco's AT&T Park (and Why the Foul Pole is Recessed): In 2012, we discussed Rule 1.04 regarding field dimensions, and specifically cited the Giants' departure from Candlestick Park to AT&T Park. Due to the new stadium's proximity to San Francisco Bay and McCovey Cove, the Giants were granted an exemption to OBR 1.04's standard 325-foot minimum length for a foul line; in San Francisco, the right field foul line spans 309 feet. In exchange for the exemption, San Francisco built a higher-than-usual wall along the fair territory right field boundary: the wall is 24 feet high (in honor of Willie Mays, who wore #24). The spectator area along the top of the wall is presently known as "Levi's Landing" and the green metal roof atop the wall, which juts out above the right field warning track, was designed to minimize questions of spectator interference; hence the ground rule calling for an automatic home run for a ball landing on the green metal. Meanwhile, the foul pole is recessed because it would be structurally unsound for a foul pole to be placed on top of what amounts to a balcony: because the foul pole is of considerable height, it requires a foundation; no earthquake-conscious engineer, architect, or contractor in good faith would allow such a tall structure in California to be placed on the edge of a balcony without adequate support underneath.
Related Post: Rule 1.04 [2.01] Note (a): Minimum Field Dimensions (6/19/12).

Video as follows:

Freeway Series Squads Clear Benches After Yunel's HBP

Los Angeles' Dodgers and Angels (of Anaheim) cleared the benches after a HBP to Yunel Escobar, with the Dodgers' broadcast wondering why Escobar would possibly be upset while the Angels' crew dug up a brief history between Escobar and Dodgers starting pitcher Clayton Kershaw.

LA's Dodgers and Angels clear the benches.

With one out and runners at the corners in the bottom of the 8th inning of a 6-2 Dodgers ballgame, Blue Crew pitcher Brandon Morrow hit Halo batter Escobar up-and-in with a first-pitch 96-mph fastball, upon which Escobar pointed into his own dugout before yelling at Morrow as the benches and bullpens cleared and Dodgers catcher Yasmani Grandal spoke with Escobar, with HP Umpire Tom Woodring, 1B Umpire Jerry Layne, 2B Umpire Mike Estabrook, and 3B Umpire Marvin Hudson helping to separate the teams.

The game proceeded without incident and concluded with no ejections. Videos via "Read More"

Spring Ejection S-2 - Tom Woodring (S1; Yasiel Puig)

HP Umpire Tom Woodring ejected Dodgers RF Yasiel Puig for arguing strike two and three calls in the bottom of the 7th inning of the Cubs-Dodgers game. With one out and none on, Puig took a 3-2 pitch from Cubs pitcher Jim Henderson for a called third strike, having taken an earlier pitch for a called strike. Replays indicate the terminal pitch was located over the outer edge of home plate and near the height of Puig's hollow of the knee (pick f/x unavailable) while the previous pitch was located over the heart of home plate and around the hollow of the knee (no replay angle from the height of the playing field was produced), the call was irrecusable. At the time of the ejection, the Cubs were leading, 1-0. The Cubs ultimately won the contest, 4-0.

This is Tom Woodring (75)'s first ejection of Spring Training, the 2017 MLB preseason.
Tom Woodring now has 0 points in the UEFL Standings (0 Previous + 0 Spring Training = 0).
Crew Chief Lance Barrett now has 0 points in Crew Division (0 Previous + 0 Spring Training = 0).

This is the second ejection report of Spring Training 2017.
This is the 2nd player ejection of 2017. Prior to ejection, Puig was 0-3 (2 SO) in the contest.
This is LA-NL's 1st ejection of Spring Training, 1st in the Cactus League (LAD 1; Others 0).
This is Yasiel Puig's first ejection since August 23, 2015 (James Hoye; QOC = Y [Balls/Strikes]).
This is Tom Woodring's first ejection since July 29, 2015 (Terry Francona; QOC = U [Non-Ejection]).

Wrap: Chicago Cubs vs. Los Angeles Dodgers (Cactus), 3/16/17 | Video via "Read More"

MLB Ejection 139: Tom Woodring (1; Terry Francona)

HP Umpire Tom Woodring ejected Indians Manager Terry Francona for arguing an ejection no-call (Unsportsmanlike-NEC) in the bottom of the 5th inning of the Royals-Indians game. With one out and none on, Indians batter Michael Brantley took a 0-1 fastball from Royals pitcher Jeremy Guthrie for a hit-by-pitch. Replays indicate the pitch was located inside and hit Brantley's calf; warnings had previously been issued after two previous hit batsmen, the call was irrecusable. At the time of the ejection, the Indians were leading, 2-0. The Indians ultimately won the contest, 12-1.

This is Tom Woodring (75)'s first ejection of 2015.
Tom Woodring now has 1 point in the UEFL Standings (-2 Previous + 3 AAA + 0 Irrecusable = 1).
Crew Chief Gary Cederstrom now has 7 points in Crew Division (6 Previous + 1 Irrecusable Call = 7).

This is the 139 ejection of the 2015 MLB Regular Season.
This is the 63rd Manager ejection of 2015.
This is the Indians' 5th ejection of 2015, T-3rd in the AL Central (KC 10; CLE, CWS, DET 5; MIN 3).
This is Terry Francona's 3rd ejection of 2015, 1st since June 28 (Ron Kulpa; QOC = Y [Balls/Strikes]).
This is Tom Woodring's first ejection since March 23, 2015 (Glenn Sherlock; QOC = U [Throwing At]).

Wrap: Kansas City Royals vs. Cleveland Indians, 7/29/15
Video: Francona wants Guthrie removed on HBP after warnings, but Woodring rules it unintentional (CLE)

MLB Ejections S-4-7: Tom Woodring (S1-4; 4 D'Backs)

HP Umpire Tom Woodring ejected Diamondbacks pitcher Allen Webster, Manager Chip Hale, pitcher Derek Eitel and Bench Coach Glenn Sherlock for throwing at Dodgers batters Justin Turner and Dillon Moyer in the bottom of the 5th and 8th innings, respectively, of the Diamondbacks-Dodgers game. In the 1st inning, Dodgers pitcher Chris Anderson hit Diamondbacks batter Mark Trumbo and Diamondbacks pitcher Daniel Hudson hit Dodgers batter Turner with inside fastballs, leading to Woodring issuing warnings to both teams. In the 5th, with warnings in effect, Dodgers lead-off batter Turner took a 2-0 fastball from D'Backs pitcher Webster for a hit-by-pitch, and was injured and left the game as a result. In the 8th, Dodgers batter Dillon Moyer took a first-pitch fastball from D'Backs pitcher Eitel for a hit-by-pitch. Replays indicate both HBPs were inside (pitch f/x unavailable), the calls were irrecusable. At the time of the 5th inning ejections, the Dodgers were leading, 4-1. At the time of the 8th inning ejections, the game was tied, 4-4. The Dodgers ultimately won the contest, 7-4.

These are Tom Woodring (75)'s first, second, third and fourth ejections of 2015 Spring Training.
Tom Woodring now has 0 points in the UEFL Standings (0 Previous + 0 Spring Training = 0).
Crew Chief Bill Miller now has 0 points in the UEFL Standings (0 Previous + 0 Irrecusable/ST = 0).

These are the 3rd and 4th player ejections of Spring Training.
This is the 2nd Manager ejection of Spring Training.
These are the D'Backs' 1st-4th ejections of the preseason, 1st in the Cactus League (ARI 4, SEA 1).
This is Allen Webster's first career MLB ejection.
This is Chip Hale's first ejection since May 30, 2013 (Brian Knight; QOC = Y [Fan Interference]).
This is Derek Eitel's first career MLB ejection.
This is Glenn Sherlock's first career MLB ejection.
These are Tom Woodring's first ejections since May 7, 2014 (Rick Renteria; QOC = Y [Balls/Strikes]).

Wrap: Arizona Diamondbacks vs. Los Angeles Dodgers (Cactus League Spring Training), 3/23/15
Video: Woodring issues warnings to both benches as Turner gets hit in the 1st inning (LAD)
Video: Turner is drilled by Webster's inside pitch, drawing heave-hos and a game-ending injury (LAD)
Video: Bean ball war claims Moyer's back, prompting two more Arizona dismissals (LAD)

MLB Instant Replay Reviews 1077-1083: September 2, 2014

September 2, 2014 featured the following MLB Instant Replay Review decisions:

Type

R#

Pos

Umpire

RU#

Team

RT#

Name

Inn

Pre

Result

R	1077	1B	Welke, Tim	15	NYY	29	Joe Girardi	5	Out	Overturned
R	1078	3B	Layne, Jerry	12	CIN	29	Bryan Price	9	Out	Stands
R	1079	1B	Woodring, Tom	6	CLE	37	Terry Francona	7	Out	Stands
R	1080	1B	Carlson, Mark	11	MIL	27	Ron Roenicke	4	Safe	Overturned
R	1081	2B	Little, Will	20	MIN	34	Ron Gardenhire	9	Safe	Overturned
R	1082	1B	Culbreth, Fieldin	14	TEX	41	Ron Washington	6	Out	Stands
R	1083	1B	Kulpa, Ron	11	STL	30	Mike Matheny	1	Safe	Overturned

MLB Instant Replay Review Videos (MLB Advanced Media):
Video 1077: BOS@NYY: Out call challenged, overturned in 5th
Video 1078: CIN@BAL: Reds lose challenge on double play in 9th, stands
Video 1079: DET@CLE: Indians lose challenge on pickoff in 7th, stands
Video 1080: MIL@CHC: Brewers win challenge on close call in 4th
Video 1081: CWS@MIN: Safe call at first overturned in 9th
Video 1082: TEX@KC: Rangers challenge a play in 6th, call stands
Video 1083: PIT@STL: Challenge of force play overturned in 1st

MLB Instant Replay Reviews 888-897: August 6, 2014

August 6, 2014 featured the following MLB Umpire Instant Replay Review decisions:

Type

R#

Pos

Umpire

RU#

Team

RT#

Name

Inn

Pre

Result

R	888	HP	Hudson, Marvin	12	MIN	28	Ron Gardenhire	2	Ball	Overturned
R	889	HP	Woodring, Tom	5	NYY	25	Joe Girardi	8	Out	Overturned
R	890	2B	Nelson, Jeff	9	PHI	29	Ryne Sandberg	1	Out	Stands
R	891	1B	Reyburn, DJ	17	BAL	23	Buck Showalter	7	Safe	Overturned
R	892	1B	Reyburn, DJ	18	BAL	24	Buck Showalter	8	Safe	Stands
R	893	1B	Reyburn, DJ	19	TOR	39	John Gibbons	8	Out	Stands
R	894	1B	Cederstrom, Gary	11	BOS	28	John Farrell	3	Out	Overturned
R	895	1B	Guccione, Chris	10	CHC	43	Rick Renteria	9	Out	Stands
R	896	1B	Randazzo, Tony	11	KC	29	Ned Yost	9	Out	Overturned
R	897	2B	Gonzalez, Manny	16	LAA	31	Mike Scioscia	4	Safe	Overturned

Instant Replay Review Decision Video Clips (MLB.com/MLBAM):
Video 888: SD@MIN: Challenge overturns called ball in the 2nd
Video 889: DET@NYY: Play at plate overturned in the 8th
Video 890: HOU@PHI: Out call stands after challenge in the 1st
Video 891: BAL@TOR: Safe call at first overturned in 7th inning
Video 892: BAL@TOR: Safe call at first stands in 8th inning
Video 893: BAL@TOR: Out call at first stands after review in 8th
Video 894: BOS@STL: Kelly's ruled out, overturned in 3rd
Video 895: CHC@COL: Out call at first stands after review in 9th
Video 896: KC@ARI: Out call on Moustakas overturned in 9th
Video 897: LAD@LAA: Safe call at second overturned in 4th inning

MLB Instant Replay Reviews 840-854: August 1, 2014

August 1, 2014 featured the following MLB Umpire Instant Replay Review decisions:

Type

R#

Pos

Umpire

RU#

Team

RT#

Name

Inn

Pre

Result

R	840	1B	Hudson, Marvin	10	TEX	28	Ron Washington	3	Safe	Overturned
R	841	3B	Blaser, Cory	9	TEX	29	Ron Washington	4	Safe	Overturned
R	842	1B	Woodring, Tom	4	CIN	21	Bryan Price	5	Safe	Overturned
r	843	2B	Carapazza, Vic	15	TB	40	Joe Maddon	2	Not HR	Stands
R	844	2B	Schrieber, Paul	11	NYY	23	Joe Girardi	6	Out	Overturned
R	845	HP	Kellogg, Jeff	8	SF	33	Bruce Bochy	2	HBP	Overturned
R	846	1B	Cederstrom, Gary	9	MIN	27	Ron Gardenhire	7	Out	Overturned
R	847	1B	Cederstrom, Gary	10	CWS	24	Robin Ventura	9	Safe	Confirmed
R	848	2B	Little, Will	15	STL	24	Mike Matheny	6	Safe	Stands
R	849	HP	Barrett, Lance	14	ARI	30	Kirk Gibson	5	Foul	Overturned
r	850	2B	Hickox, Ed	9	PIT	37	Clint Hurdle	8	Not HR	Confirmed
r	851	HP	Wolf, Jim	11	LAD	29	Don Mattingly	1	Out	Confirmed
R	852	1B	Randazzo, Tony	9	CHC	40	Rick Renteria	3	Safe	Overturned
R	853	1B	Randazzo, Tony	10	LAD	30	Don Mattingly	6	Safe	Overturned
R	854	HP	Wolf, Jim	12	CHC	41	Rick Renteria	6	Safe	Stands

Instant Replay Review Decision Video Clips (MLB.com/MLBAM):
Video 840: TEX@CLE: Chisenhall ruled out after challenge in 3rd
Video 841: TEX@CLE: Aviles out at third after challenge in 4th
Video 842: CIN@MIA: Jones ruled out after challenge in 5th
Video 843: LAA@TB: Loney's double stands after review in 2nd
Video 844: NYY@BOS: Ellsbury safe after challenge in 6th
Video 845: SF@NYM: Hit by pitch overturned in the 2nd
Video 846: MIN@CWS: Dozier safe at first after challenge in 7th
Video 847: MIN@CWS: Dozier confirmed safe at first in the 9th
Video 848: MIL@STL: Segura safe as call stands in the 6th
Video 849: PIT@ARI: Nuno hit by pitch after review in 5th
Video 850: PIT@ARI: Harrison's triple confirmed in the 8th
Video 851: CHC@LAD: Adrian confirmed out at home in the 1st
Video 852: CHC@LAD: Haren thrown out from right field in 3rd
Video 853: CHC@LAD: Rizzo out at first after challenge in 6th
Video 854: CHC@LAD: Puig scores as call stands in the 6th