Sunday, August 19, 2018

Walk-Off Balk - Dodgers' Floro Does Too Much at Once

Rarer than a perfect game, a walk-off balk plagued Los Angeles Dodgers pitcher Dylan Floro in Seattle Saturday night, handing the Mariners a 5-4 extra inning win as baserunner R3 Cameron Maybin scored on Floro's botched step-off and illegal move from the rubber.

Rare? Seattle's was only the 22nd balkoff win in MLB history, compared to 23 perfect games.

Analyzing a rarity: LA-SEA's walk-off balk.
The Play: With one out and the bases loaded in the bottom of the 10th inning, Mariners batter Kyle Seager prepared to face the 0-1 pitch from Dodgers pitcher Floro as Mariners baserunner R3 Maybin danced down the line, distracting Floro such that Floro attempted to step off the rubber, resulting in a balk call by 1B Umpire Andy Fletcher, the resulting award of home plate ending the game in balkoff fashion.

The Rule: To see if Fletcher had this call correct or not, we turn to Official Baseball Rule 6.02(a)(1), which states that with runners, it is a balk when—"The pitcher, while touching his plate, makes any motion naturally associated with his pitch and fails to make such delivery." Rule 6.02(a)(10) is also relevant to this play, so we will reference that provision of the balk rule as well: "The pitcher, after coming to a legal pitching position, removes one hand from the ball other than in an actual pitch, or in throwing to a base."

Analysis: Floro, seeing Maybin relatively far from third base, attempted to slow the runner by stepping off the rubber. First, we establish that Floro is pitching from Set Position (occurs when a pitcher stands facing the batter with the pivot foot in contact with the pitcher's plate and the other foot entirely in front of the plate, 5.07(a)(2)).

This is important because prior to assuming Set Position (i.e., before coming set), "the pitcher may elect to make any natural preliminary motion such as that known as 'the stretch'...After assuming Set Position, any natural motion associated with his delivery of the ball to the batter commits him to the pitch without alteration or interruption."
Related PostOdd Position - Limits of a Legal Pitching Delivery [Set vs Windup] (3/6/18).

Floro's walk-off balk in three parts.
During this play, Floro comes set in Frame A, after which he moves both his arms leg(s), and torso in Frame B, before separating his hands in the time between B and Frame C.

This qualifies as a "natural motion associated with delivery" and, because Floro failed to deliver the ball to the batter, this is a balk. It is also a separation of hands without pitching or throwing to a base.

Conclusion & Plain English: Whether you want to use knee pop, double set, or even start-stop as rationale, it all leads to the same place: Floro's body was far too "busy" during the fateful sequence to be legal.

Lest this sound too subjective, let's break it down in a more mechanically objective fashion.

This is a balk because when Floro attempts to disengage from the pitcher's plate, he simultaneously moves other parts of his body—be it his arms, free leg, torso, or hands—and in doing so, makes a series of natural motions associated with delivery.

For instance, Dodgers Manager Dave Roberts after the game called it both a "buckle of the knee" and a "flinch after he came set," crediting Fletcher with making the correct call.

Back to our snapshot: Frame B looks very much like a pitcher in the midst of a delivery to the batter, who has opted to abort said delivery by the time he arrives at Frame C. This is a balk.

But what about the "deceives the runner" provision of the balk rule? Who did he deceive?

Roberts seeks an explanation after the game.
Critics of the call and the balk rule itself are quick to cite Rule 6.02(a) Comment (ironic for a critic of the rule to cite the rule as a defense, but I digress...), which states, "Umpires should bear in mind that the purpose of the balk rule is to prevent the pitcher from deliberately deceiving the base runner. If there is doubt in the umpire’s mind, the 'intent' of the pitcher should govern."

The answer to Rule 6.02(a) Comment's question of intent is simple: F1 Floro attempted to step off for and because of one primary factor: Baserunner R3 Maybin. It is illegal for a pitcher to stop his delivery to interact with a runner and this is the "intent" that Rule 6.02(a) Comment refers to.

Floro's intent was to prevent Maybin from getting too big of a lead, or to stop Maybin from jogging along the baseline. Accordingly, this "intent"—even if only to reset the play, thus depriving Maybin of his legal competitive advantage—shall govern.

That's a balk.

How Could Floro Fix It? As stated above, Floro balked because he did too much at once: he kept his arms and hands moving as he attempted to step off with his pivot foot, twitching his torso and popping his free knee in the process. There are many ways to grab a balk here and, accordingly, many ways Floro can fix his disengagement to make sure he doesn't balk.

The secret? Slow things down, keep the arms still, in their alignment from coming set, and try not to twitch the non-pivot leg. A pitcher legally disengages by stepping back and off the rubber with his pivot foot, but the key for a legal step-off is to keep the rest of the body silent while doing so. For instance, don't start to pull the hands apart before the pivot foot has disengaged the rubber (unless, of course, a pickoff throw is involved; remember that fakes to first and third are illegal).

Isolating motion to only that vital to step off the rubber (the pivot foot and leg) will help avert a balk.

Gil's Call: My only wonderment is how the first base umpire saw this ahead of, or even in place of, the rest of the crew, since the pitcher's back was to him more than to anyone else. There appears to be a definitive twitch or body-rotation prior to the attempted disengagement, but to see it from behind the pitcher is some kind of accomplishment that proves why Fletcher is a big leaguer. Nonetheless, this is an excellent pickup by U1.

Video as follows:

Saturday, August 18, 2018

MLB Ejection 127 - Cory Blaser (3; Craig Counsell)

HP Umpire Cory Blaser ejected Brewers Manager Craig Counsell (warnings) in the bottom of the 1st inning of the Brewers-Cardinals game. With two out and none on, Cardinals batter Tyler O'Neill took a first-pitch fastball from Brewers pitcher Wade Miley inside for a called first ball, resulting in warnings. Replays indicate the pitch was located inside and thrown between O'Neill's feet; Brewers batter Lorenzo Cain had been hit by a pitch from Cardinals pitcher Miles Mikolas in the top of the 1st, the call was irrecusable. At the time of the ejection, the game was tied, 0-0. The Cardinals ultimately won the contest, 7-2.

This is Cory Blaser (89)'s third ejection of 2018
Cory Blaser now has 8 points in the UEFL Standings (6 Prev + 2 MLB + 0 Irrecusable Call = 8).
Crew Chief Gary Cederstrom now has 9 points in Crew Division (8 Previous + 1 Irrecusable Call = 9).
*Standards for Removal from the Game: Manager shall be ejected if...enters the field to dispute a warning.

This is the 127th ejection report of the 2018 MLB regular season.
This is the 51st Manager ejection of 2018.
This is Milwaukee's 5th ejection of 2018, 2nd in the NL Central (CHC 8; MIL 5; CIN 3; PIT, STL 2).
This is Craig Counsell's 4th ejection of 2018, 1st since June 6 (Quinn Wolcott; QOC = Y [Balls/Strikes]).
This is Cory Blaser's 3rd ejection of 2018, 1st since April 22 (Andy Haines; QOC = U [Warnings]).

Wrap: Milwaukee Brewers vs. St. Louis Cardinals, 8/18/18 | Video as follows:

Fan Inter-Beer-ence - Baseball's Neutral Zone

Friday's Replay Review that upheld umpires' home run and fan interference no-call in San Diego upset Arizona after video conclusively indicated that Diamondbacks left fielder Jon Jay's glove made contact with a Padres fan's beer during Eric Hosmer's solo-HR in the bottom of the 5th inning.

Did a fan interfere with Jay in San Diego?
Lest they say we're going to the animals in the jungle of outfield fandom, let's cruise into our capstone report on spectator interference, introducing a concept of interference neutrality.

The Play: With one out and none on during Friday's D'Backs-Padres game, Padres batter Hosmer hit a fly ball to deep left field. As D'Backs outfielder Jay leapt to catch Hosmer's batted ball, his right hand and glove came into contact with a fan in the left field bleachers attempting to do the same. Upon Crew Chief Review, the Replay Official upheld 3B Umpire Sean Barber's on-field ruling of home run (no fan interference).

The Rule: By now, we know that "Spectator interference occurs when a spectator (or an object thrown by the spectator) hinders a player’s attempt to make a play on a live ball, by going onto the playing field, or reaching out of the stands and over the playing field."
Related PostMLB Changes Rules for Retired Runner, Fan Interference (3/25/18).

We're dealt with this play before, most recently when Astros batter Alex Bregman fell prey to an interference ruling by 2B Umpire Greg Gibson, but it's time to add another layer to the issue. We call it baseball's "neutral zone."
Related PostFact Check - Bregman's Fan Interference Out (7/26/18).

Related Rule: The Definition of Terms states that "FAIR TERRITORY is that part of the playing field within, and including the first base and third base lines, from home base to the bottom of the playing field fence and perpendicularly upwards. All foul lines are in fair territory" (underline added for emphasis).

The neutral zone is a free-for-all.
Analysis: This neutral zone encompasses that area referred to as the "top of the wall" extended vertically upward—any fly ball that bounces off the top of the wall, untouched by a fan, and caroms back onto the field is considered live and in play, while any ball that bounces off the top of the wall and caroms into the seats behind is deemed a home run.

For all intents and purposes relative to this rule, wall padding is to be considered part of the wall itself.

As for a ball that sticks to the top of the wall, that's where the neutral zone takes on a rather unique quality: if a batted ball in flight strikes and settles on top of an outfield wall without a fan touching it, the call is "Time" and a two-base award. If a fan does touch the ball atop the wall before it settles, the proper call is "Home Run."

Summary of Top-of-the-Wall Batted Ball Considerations/Calls (Fair ball, wall/seats in fair territory):
Fly ball hits top of wall and immediately bounces back into play, untouched by fans = In Play.
Fly ball hits top of wall and immediately bounces out of play (in fair territory) = Home Run.
Fly ball hits top of wall, eventually settling on top of the wall, untouched by a fan = Two Bases.
Fly ball hits top of wall, and a fan picks it up while it's still in motion on top of the wall = HR.
Fly ball hits top of wall, and a fan picks it up after it's settled on top of the wall = Two Bases.

I'm not kidding—that's the importance of this neutral zone and an example of how a spry home-town fan can influence the game simply by choosing to touch or not touch a batted ball on top of the wall.

Relative to actual fan interference, because the term is interference, this implies a violative act (by the fan). In order to be said to have violated a rule, the fan has to actively engage in misconduct by "reaching out of the stands and over the playing field" (or by going onto the playing field).

Jay's arm bends backward above the wall.
In other words, "reaching out of the stands" and into the neutral zone is not enough for interference: the fan must break the plane separating the playing field from the neutral zone in order to submit candidacy for interference; otherwise, the fielder reaches into the neutral zone (and stands) at his own peril.

The accompanying image indicates Jay's right arm is flush with the outfield wall, and bends backward at the wrist (and possibly elbow, as well), which is at or above the height of the wall. This portion of Jay's body and glove which has bent backward beyond the base-of-wall plane and into the neutral zone is not subject to protection against interference: if the fan makes contact with the portion of Jay's person or glove that is extended into the neutral zone, this contact shall not be deemed fan interference for the fielder has reached out of the playing field at his own peril.

That makes this the proper ruling, for lack of evidence or angle to suggest the fan broke the playing field plane.

SIDEBAR: Another baseball saying holds that "it all evens out." Perhaps, one can consider this an even-out play for Padres Manager Andy Green, who was ejected in April on an interference no-call decision (also finalized via Replay Review) that went against San Diego.
Related PostMLB Ejection 011 - Brian Gorman (1; Andy Green) (4/9/18).

Video as follows:

Friday, August 17, 2018

MLB Ejection 126 - James Hoye (1; Nick Ahmed)

HP Umpire James Hoye ejected Diamondbacks SS Nick Ahmed (strike three call; QOCY) in the top of the 3rd inning of the Diamondbacks-Padres game. With none out and two on (R2, R3), Ahmed took a 2-2 sinker from Padres pitcher Joey Lucchesi for a called third strike. Replays indicate the pitch was located over the inner edge of home plate and thigh-high (px -.805, pz 1.927 [sz_bot 1.589]) and that all pitches during the at-bat were properly officiated, the call was correct.* At the time of the ejection, the Diamondbacks were leading, 4-1. The Diamondbacks ultimately won the contest, 9-4.

This is James Hoye (92)'s first ejection of 2018.
James Hoye now has 5 points in the UEFL Standings (1 Prev + 2 MLB + 2 Correct Call = 5).
Crew Chief Eric Cooper now has 3 points in Crew Division (2 Previous + 1 Correct Call = 3).
*UEFL Rule 6-2-b-1 (Kulpa Rule): |0| < STRIKE < |.748| < BORDERLINE < |.914| < BALL.
This pitch was located 1.308 horizontal inches from being deemed an incorrect call.

This is the 126th ejection report of the 2018 MLB regular season.
This is the 62nd player ejection of 2018. Prior to ejection, Ahmed was 1-2 (SO) in the contest.
This is Arizona's 6th ejection of 2018, T-2nd in the NL West (LAD 7; ARI, SD, SF 6; COL 4).
This is Nick Ahmed's first ejection since April 24, 2016 (Marin Hudson; QOC = N [Balls/Strikes]).
This is James Hoye's first ejection since May 28, 2016 (Alfredo Simon; QOC = U [Throwing At]).

Wrap: Arizona Diamondbacks vs. San Diego Padres, 8/17/18 | Video as follows:

MLB Ejection 125 - Ben May (1; Don Mattingly)

HP Umpire Ben May ejected Marlins Manager Don Mattingly (strike three call; QOCN) in the top of the 4th inning of the Marlins-Nationals game. With two out and one on (R2), Marlins batter Derek Dietrich took a 3-2 cutter from Nationals pitcher Max Scherzer for a called third strike. Replays indicate the pitch was located off the outer edge of home plate and thigh-high (px -1.059, pz 2.610), the call was incorrect.* At the time of the ejection, the Nationals were leading, 2-0. The Nationals ultimately won the contest, 8-2.

This is Ben May (97)'s first ejection of 2018.
Ben May now has 1 point in the UEFL Standings (3 Prev + 2 AAA - 4 Incorrect Call = 1).
Crew Chief Ted Barrett now has 12 points in Crew Division (12 Previous + 0 Incorrect Call = 12).
*UEFL Rule 6-2-b-1 (Kulpa Rule): |0| < STRIKE < |.748| < BORDERLINE < |.914| < BALL.
This pitch was located 1.74 horizontal inches from being deemed a correct call.

This is the 125th ejection report of the 2018 MLB regular season.
This is the 50th Manager ejection of 2018.
This is Miami's 5th ejection of 2018, T-2nd in the NL East (WAS 6; MIA, NYM 5; ATL 3; PHI 0).
This is Don Mattingly's 2nd ejection of 2018, 1st since June 19 (Andy Fletcher; QOC = U [Throwing At]).
This is Ben May's first ejection since June 28, 2016 (Clint Hurdle; QOC = Y [Balls/Strikes]).

Wrap: Miami Marlins vs. Washington Nationals, 8/17/18 | Video as follows:

Statcast - Umpire Manny Gonzalez's Bat Flip Catch

We've seen home plate umpires snare discarded catcher's masks on foul balls in the past, so when we saw HP Umpire Manny Gonzalez caught Tigers hitter Nicholas Castellanos' bat out of the air during a celebratory flip on Thursday in Minnesota, it seemed a natural extension of the modern athletic plate umpire's projectile-catching prowess.

Though Manny's bat catch is likely not the first time an umpire has caught a flying bat, it is the first time in memory that MLBAM's Statcast technology has been used to highlight an umpire's play that doesn't involve the strike zone.

In addition to potential definite overuse of a stock sound effects library, the MLBAM crew used Statcast to calculate the bat's launch angle (90.4-degrees), the umpire's catch probability (52.8%), and his extension on the catch (3.2 feet).

Video as follows:

Plate Meeting Podcast Ep 3 Teaser - Brian Hertzog

Announcing Episode 3 of The Plate Meeting, a LF Umpire Podcast from CloseCallSports.com, which will debut Monday. Tmac & Gil are joined by Brian Hertzog, former MiLB umpire and CEO of Official Business, who talks his career, release & life after Minor League Baseball, and the topic of game management, which transcends all levels of officiating.

It's a story to which many Minor League umpires can relate. MiLB Umpire Development previously said that only five percent of umpires in the minors will make it to the major leagues, and less than one percent of umpire school attendees will see regular season MLB action.

Episode 3 of The Plate Meeting debuts Monday, August 20.

The following video teaser features Hertzog's recollection of a brawl he presided over in Reno (AAA):

Replay Review and the Seven-Minute Balk Call

A botched pickoff attempt and balk call against Toronto in Kansas City turned into a seven-minute delay as 2B Umpire and acting Chief Marvin Hudson consulted Replay Review for a rules check, affirming the crew's original ruling to award Royals baserunner Rosell Herrera second base on Blue Jays pitcher Sam Gaviglio's fumble at the mound.

A balk in KC resulted in a seven-minute delay.
The Play: With two out and one on (R1) with Royals batter Jorge Bonifacio at the plate, Blue Jays pitcher Sam Gaviglio attempted to pick off Royals baserunner R1 Rosell Herrera at first base. Replays indicate Gaviglio fumbled the ball while attempting a jump-turn pickoff maneuver, and the errant ball came to rest in the grass between the pitcher's mound and first base foul line aside the home dugout.

The Call: Initially ruled a balk by 2B Umpire and crew chief Marvin Hudson, who convened his crew of HP Umpire Bruce Dreckman, 1B Umpire Mike Estabrook, and 3B Umpire Chris Segal following the play, the umpires agreed to a rules check upon request from Blue Jays Manager John Gibbons, after which the balk ruling prevailed and Herrera was awarded second base.

The Rule: The relevant rule here is OBR 6.02(a)(11), which states, "It is a balk when—The pitcher, while touching his plate, accidentally or intentionally has the ball slip or fall out of his hand or glove."

John Gibbons states his case for a reversal.
So why the seven-minute delay for a non-reviewable balk?

Recall that a balk of this sort requires the pitcher to be "touching his plate." If the pitcher is not on the rubber when he loses the ball, it is treated the same as if he were another fielder who has bobbled the ball: no penalty.

Thus, if the ball slips out of his hand/glove while the pitcher is making a move from the rubber, it is a balk, but if the ball slips out after he has already legally disengaged the rubber, thus becoming an infielder, there is no call to make.

Was F1 Touching His Plate? As we previously explained during Pat Hoberg's reversed balk call and ejection of Twins Manager Paul Molitor in June, the MLB Umpire Manual states that such a jump-turn pickoff move is to be interpreted as occurring from the rubber: "It is legal for a right-handed pitcher to begin a pickoff move to first base by first moving his pivot foot in the direction of third base provided that he makes a legal step toward first base with the non-pivot foot before throwing there and provided that the move is continuous and without interruption. A pitcher who makes such a pickoff move is considered to be in contact with the rubber when he makes his throw to first base."
Related PostMLB Ejections 081-82 - Davis, Hoberg (1, 3; Glynn, Molitor) (6/27/18).

Pitcher Gaviglio loses the ball during pickoff.
Analysis: Right-handed pitcher Gaviglio's continuous move toward first without interruption is a legal pickoff move that is considered "in contact with the rubber." Because it is considered in contact with the rubber (aka "while touching his plate"), Rule 6.02(a)(11) is applicable.

Conclusion: This is a balk because the ball accidentally or intentionally slipped or fell out of the pitcher's hand or glove while the pitcher was said to be in contact with the rubber. Recall that during a balk, the ball remains live until playing action has subsided and the ball otherwise may be declared dead.

SIDEBAR A: Upon slow-motion review of the play, it is apparent that pitcher Gaviglio's front leg may have flinched prior to his jump-turn pickoff move. If called, the leg-flinch balk is covered under OBR 6.02(a)(1) ("The pitcher, while touching his plate, makes any motion naturally associated with his pitch and fails to make such delivery").

SIDEBAR B (aka PITFALL TO AVOID): This is not a situation where the play would be considered "ball one" if the baseball crossed the foul line because this was not a pitched ball, and, moreover the bases were not unoccupied.

The illegal pitch/foul line issue is irrelevant.
The rule about a ball that slips out of the pitcher's hand and crosses the foul line is 6.02(b) Comment (which is called "Illegal Pitches with Bases Unoccupied" and, again, is not applicable here), and states: "A ball which slips out of a pitcher’s hand and crosses the foul line shall be called a ball; otherwise it will be called no pitch. This would be a balk with men on base."

Even if one were to consider this a delivery (assuming that, for instance, the ball rolled across home plate), it would be a balk pursuant to Rule 6.02(a)(6), which states, it is a balk when—"The pitcher delivers the ball to the batter while he is not facing the batter."

Again, this was clearly not a delivery to the batter so 6.02(a)(6) is not applicable, but just in case the "what if it crossed the foul line?" argument were to be made, this should adequately demonstrate that the "call it a ball" rule is not applicable to this play with a runner on first.

Video as follows:

Thursday, August 16, 2018

Commentary Critique - Ball is Live After Missed Base

Welcome back to Commentary Critique, where we respond to a broadcaster's statement about the rules of baseball with book-supported analysis. In this edition, we listen to YES Network's summation about a runner's missed base during Thursday's Rays-Yankees game.

Appeal failure leads to Pham's advance.
The Play: With none out and two on (R1, R3), Rays batter Tommy Pham doubled to Yankees left fielder Shane Robinson, scoring Rays baserunner R3 Joey Wendle as R1 Jake Bauers attempted to advance to third base as Robinson's throw arrived in third baseman Miguel Andujar's glove. Bauers successfully slid to avoid Andujar's tag, failing to touch third base in the process, and continued advancing toward home plate, where he was ultimately tagged out by Andujar.

The Call: 2B Umpire Nic Lentz (3B Umpire Jordan Baker was in the outfield due to the rotation play, leaving Lentz to cover the play at third base) kept play alive and made no call until Andujar physically tagged Bauers, upon which HP Umpire Jerry Layne declared Bauers out and U2 Lentz called batter-runner Pham safe at third base.

Commentary Critique, Statement: As Yankees Manager Aaron Boone ("10% Boone") exited the dugout to argue the call, Yankees broadcaster Michael Kay surmised that the umpires should have declared baserunner Bauers out after he passed third and continued toward home plate without having touched third base.

Said Kay, "Once he takes off for home, the third base umpire should call him out and you can defend third against Pham. Instead you go into a full rundown that isn't needed, and that allows Pham to get to third."

Boone argues the call with Layne & Gibson.
Commentary Critique, QOC: This statement is inaccurate (QOCN). While advancing past a base without touching it is illegal, the defense must still put out the violative runner, either via a tag while off his base, or via claiming violation of the rules by virtue of an appeal. The ball remains live and "Time" shall not be called simply because a runner failed to touch a base. A runner is considered to have achieved a base when he passes it, whether or not he physically touches it.

Commentary Correction: If Kay's statement were to be accurate, it should have been, "Once he takes off for home, the third baseman should appeal to the umpire that the runner missed third base, which would allow him to defend third against Pham. Instead, the fielder goes into a rundown that isn't needed, and that allows Pham to get to third."

The Rule: Official Baseball Rule 5.09(b)(4) is the rule that describes how the Yankees retired Bauers during this play: "Any runner is out when—He is tagged, when the ball is alive, while off his base."

OBR 5.09(c)(2) states, "Any runner shall be called out, on appeal, when—With the ball in play, while advancing or returning to a base, he fails to touch each base in order before he, or a missed base, is tagged."

Diagram of when a runner passes a base.
This appeal procedure under 5.09(c)(2) references violation by the offense for failing to satisfy Rule 5.06(b)(1), which states, "In advancing, a runner shall touch first, second, third and home base in order."

This appeal can only be effected when the runner has run past the base and continued to advance or made no attempt to return to (re)touch it (e.g., overrunning first base without touching it...see references section below). Regardless of whether or not the runner has physically touched the base, said runner is considered to have passed a base "if he has both feet on the ground beyond the back edge of the base or beyond the edge of the base in the direction to which he is advancing."

Conclusion: In this case, R1 Bauers clearly runs (or slides) past third base without touching it. As previously stated, the ball remains live during the entirety of this play, whether or not an appeal is made.

Bauers briefly considers trying to touch third.
Once Bauers continues his advancement having failed to touch third base, the appeal may be executed by communicating to the umpire an intention to appeal while tagging the allegedly missed base. Had F5 Andujar tagged third base while holding the ball as R1 Bauers was running home, the proper call would be to declare Bauers out on appeal for missing third base. Obviously, the runner may be tagged out while standing off his base, as in Rule 5.09(b)(4), but this is not an appeal play unless the tagging fielder makes it clear to the umpire that he is appealing the runner's baserunning violation.

Why is this distinction important? If, with R1 and R3, there were two outs and R1 Bauers missed second base on Pham's hit to the outfield, and the defense successfully appealed that Bauers missed second base, then the appeal would result in both a force out and the third out of the inning, meaning that R3 Wendle's run would not count and the batter would not be credited with a hit.

Naturally, the defense could get both the third out via a standard 5.09(b)(4) tag and a fourth out via appeal (the fourth out would take precedence over the third out, thus becoming the official third out).

References: The so-called real-time appeal play is a rare, but quite practical occurrence in baseball.
Related PostRare Real-Time Appeal Retires Runner over Retouch Rule (6/15/17).
Related PostOfficially Speaking - Hanley, an avid Hunter...of Outs (6/23/16).
Related PostUEFL Series: Baseball Rules in the Real World (Fourth Out) (1/18/14).

Video as follows:

Wednesday, August 15, 2018

MLB Ejections 123-124 - Nauert, Fairchild (2, 2; MIA-ATL)

3B Umpire Paul Nauert ejected Braves Manager Brian Snitker (fighting) and HP Umpire Chad Fairchild ejected Marlins pitcher Jose Ureña (throwing at Braves batter Ronald Acuña resulting in injury; QOCU) in the bottom of the 1st inning of the Marlins-Braves game. With none out and none on, Ureña's first pitch of the ballgame stuck Acuña for a hit-by-pitch. Replays indicate the pitch was located inside and made contact with Acuña on his left arm and elbow, resulting in a bench-clearing incident during which Snitker was ejected for fighting and after which Ureña was ejected for intentionally throwing at a batter, the call was irrecusable. At the time both ejections, the Marlins were leading, 1-0. The Braves ultimately won the contest, 5-2.

This is Chad Fairchild (4)'s second ejection of 2018.
This is Paul Nauert (39)'s second ejection of 2018.
Chad Fairchild now has 11 points in the UEFL Standings (9 Prev + 2 MLB + 0 Irrecusable Call = 11).
Paul Nauert now has 2 points in the UEFL Standings (0 Previous + 2 MLB + 0 Irrecusable Call = 2).
Crew Chief Paul Nauert now has 4 points in Crew Division (2 Previous + 2*[1 Irrecusable Call] = 4).

This is the 123rd and 124th ejection report of the 2018 MLB regular season.
This is the 49th Manager ejection of 2018.
This is the 61st player ejection of 2018. Prior to ejection, Ureña's line was 0.0 IP, HBP.
This is Atlanta's 3rd ejection of 2018, 4th in the NL East (WAS 6; NYM 5; MIA 4; ATL 3; PHI 0).
This is Miami's 4th ejection of 2018, 3rd in the NL East (WAS 6; NYM 5; MIA 4; ATL 3; PHI 0).
This is Brian Snitker's 3rd ejection of 2018, 1st since March 31 (Jerry Layne; QOC = U [Pace of Play]).
This is Jose Ureña's first career MLB ejection.
This is Paul Nauert's 2nd ejection of 2018, 1st since May 17 (Jeff Banister; QOC = N [Balls/Strikes]).
This is Chad Fairchild's 2nd ejection of 2018, 1st since June 20 (Alcides Escobar; QOC = Y [Balls/Strikes]).

Wrap: Miami Marlins vs. Atlanta Braves, 8/15/18 | Video as follows: